If the four SCOTUS liberals disagree with you, you’re a partisan ideologue – right?

I predicted a brush back pitch, Ilya Shapiro chooses a different baseball analogy in Why Obama Strikes Out with the Court:

As the world awaits the Supreme Court’s ruling on ObamaCare, there’s a larger story that the pundits are missing: the court’s rejection of the Obama administration’s increasingly extreme claims on behalf of unlimited federal power.

This term alone, the high court has ruled unanimously against the government on religious liberty, criminal procedure and property rights. When the administration can’t get even a single one of the liberal justices to agree with it in these unrelated areas of the law, that’s a sign there’s something wrong with its constitutional vision

The government’s arguments across a wide variety of cases would essentially allow Congress and the executive branch to do whatever they wanted without meaningful constitutional restraint…

If the government loses in the health-care or immigration cases, it won’t be because its lawyers had a bad day in court or because the justices ruled based on their political preferences. It will be because the Obama administration continues to make legal arguments that don’t pass the smell test.


This entry was posted in Freedom, Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to If the four SCOTUS liberals disagree with you, you’re a partisan ideologue – right?

  1. Paul Marks says:

    The present Obama contempt for the law and Constitution is very bad – but it will seem moderate compared to what he will do if reelected.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s